Pages

Saturday, March 31, 2012

Shoes or pedestals?



I just found these shoes at one of those blogs of passionate fashion women. She said she has to have these... shoes.

I'm not getting it. Are these real shoes?

I've been seeing women walking on things like that and can see that they are having a hard time to put one foot after another.

It seems to me that some fashion items were transformed in objects of desire and the body has to be adjusted to them. After being used twice they go to the decorate the closet.

Elegance lost it's sense or am I missing something?




April Fool's Day

"Man is the only animals that laughs and weeps, for he is the only animal that is struck with the difference of what things are, and what they ought to be." ~ William Hazlitt


Blogger is changing yet again on 1st April - I hope it doesn't turn out to be an April Fool that we have to live with for months to come.


Happy April 1st. A day traditionally known as April Fool's Day or All Fools’ Day. [Please note the difference in where the apostrophe lies with those two titles.] No one seems to know who or why this day was called April Fool's Day, but evidence of this day goes back at least as far as Geoffrey Chaucer's 'Canterbury Tales' published in 1392.

This therefore gives the lie to the idea that it stems from when New Year's Day was changed from March 25th to January 1st. In the Middle Ages March 25th was celebrated as New Year's Day and a week long celebration would ensue ending on April 1st. It has been alleged that when New Year's Day was changed to January 1st, that those who still celebrated the 'old ways' because they were traditionalists – or simply hadn’t yet heard about the change - were considered fools.  I suppose the folk at Blogger would consider me a fool because I am used to doing things the old way and see no reason to switch.

Pass me my cane and hat will you, I'm off out...



In Annunciation Style dating the new year started on 25 March, the feast of the Annunciation. This was used in many parts of Europe in the Middle Ages. Annunciation Style continued to be used officially in Great Britain until 1 January 1752 except in Scotland which [being cut off from the rest of the country] changed to Circumcision Style dating on 1 January 1600. The rest of Great Britain changed to the Feast of Circumcision Style on 1 January preceding the conversion in Great Britain from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar on 3/14 September 1752.

The Julian Calendar that had been in use until that time had been developed 1700 years earlier, at the order of Julius Caesar, and had worked very well in the beginning but by the 16th century the seasons had grown out of alignment with the date. A new calendar was developed under the auspices of Pope Gregory XIII in 1582/3 and the Catholic countries of Europe were quick to adopt it. It took much longer for the Protestant countries to make the switch which meant that, for several centuries, two different calendars were in use in Europe. [One remarkable side effect of this was that getting on board an Alitalia flight to Italy involved not only putting your watch on but playing with your calendar and trying to see if you could have a fortnight’s holiday in the sun without being away from home at all].

The UK tax year still starts on 6 April which is 25 March + 12 days, eleven for the conversion from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar plus a dropped leap day in 1900. [But then the Inland Revenue has always been full of fools and even more unpleasant creatures who, this year, are demanding £2,500 over and above my normal 'donation' to the revenue - B******s.]

It’s traditional in many countries in the West to play tricks on people on April 1st. Sadly, neither Blogger nor the Inland Revenue are joking.


The earliest evidence of trick-playing came from France. There, the tradition is called Poisson d’Avril or April Fish, since, on that day, the French would often tape a cardboard fish onto someone’s backside or send them on a fool’s errand.

All of the above calendar information is, of course, totally irrelevant since, as we have already established, Chaucer mentioned April Fools. So you’ve just wasted five minutes but I hope you enjoyed it.

Have a nice day...

Todd Stave's Voice of Choice: fighting the criminal tactics of pro-lifers







I didn't know about the tactics that "pro-lifers" are using in America. I knew about protests in front of clinics and that's all. But after knowing that  doctor George Tiller was shot dead in 2009 after suffering many attacks I did a research and I'm appalled by the way anti-abortion believers are behaving.



They are harassing and defaming doctors who perform abortions in the most heinous way.

Todd Stave created Voice of Choice after being victim of these tactics:


"For too long, the abortion discussion has been dominated by angry, nasty protests fueled by individuals and organizations that thrive on sensationalism and extremism.

Now it is our turn.

“Voice of Choice” was established as a calm, measured response to anti-abortion activists who engage in misguided, raging protest tactics that are often ill-informed and only serve to victimize women, pro-choice professionals, law-abiding businesses and unaligned bystanders.

 We use email, telephone and social media in peaceful, person-to-person counter-protests against groups that target abortion facilities, providers and patients, as well as their families and communities. We don’t question anyone’s right to express opinions and ideals; we challenge their bullying tactics and their contempt.

This is the solution to cope with the fanaticism of many who not only respect other people's ideas and actions but are also willing to do whatever they want, even if it is criminal, to force others behave the way they think is morally correct.



The debate about abortion is far from over but it is unacceptable this conduct of pro-lifers that forget that abortion is legal in US. Why don't they use arguments instead? Arguments, not sensationalists and defamatory fliers like this one below. This is criminal. Sometimes I do not understand the first amendment.







Is it legal? It was spread at Mr. Todd's neighborhood. He is a father.  This is one of the dirty strategies pro-lifers use in America.

And what about Dr George Tiller's death? He was not the first to die in such circumstances.

Mr. Obama issued a statement after Dr. Tiller’s killing in 2009, saying,

“However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence.”


Star Classic lawn 2012-13

Star Classic Lawn By Naveed Nawaz Textiles For Spring Summer













Naveed Nawaz Textiles Star Gold Lawn Spring Dresses

Star Gold lawn prints 2012 by Naveed Nawaz Textiles









[CARTOON] Using Electricity

Cartoon about religion, music, technology,

All about Amish

Urumi Movie Stills













                                           

Muppozhudhum Un Karpanaigal Movie Stills







Samantha Latest Still

                                             Samantha
















Banana Republic Spring Summer Clothing 2012

Women's Clothing | Banana Republic Spring Summer Clothing 2012Introducing our new collection of versatile, safari-inspired separates that are classically refined and creatively redefined. Enjoy the stylish adventure..Banana Republic an accessible-luxury brand bringing modern, soulful, effortless style to men and women around the world. Characterized by elevated design, luxurious fabrications and

Resham Ghar Clothes Summer Collection 2012

Resham Ghar Summer Collection 2012















Daaman Casual Ready to Wear Collection 2011 for Girls

Daaman Latest Summer Collection 2012


Housing Voice Independent Inquiry: London & SE

On Thursday I made a verbal submission to this inquiry. Housing Voice is the "campaign alliance established to champion the need for more affordable homes to buy or rent". The inquiry is gathering evidence across the country on ways to combat the "affordable housing crisis". Lord Larry Whitty is chairing the inquiry (seen in centre of picture with panel members Steve Hilditch and Michael Ward).

Heidi Alexander MP for Lewisham East and on the CLG Select Committee (left) spoke as did UNISON General Secretary Dave Prentis.  There were 18 speakers listed! "Housing Professionals Voices", "Voices of those at the sharp end"; "Labour Voices", "Local and Regional elected" and "Other voices".  There were politicians from across the political divide. Residents and a wide range of other people with interest in affordable housing took part and contributed.

There was disagreement about the solution but no-one denied that we have an appalling housing shortage and that homes are currently unaffordable especially in London. Access to land with permission to build, planning and finance seems to be major barriers. Solutions offered included housing co-operatives, deregulation (House Builders Federation) and greater regulation (of private sector including rent controls: not I think supported by the HBF), funding from pension funds.

I think the role of public funding is absolute key and while there is a lot that can be done to improve supply and affordability at the margin, without a significant funding in state funding we will not resolve the crisis. We will only get the funding when we can raise the political interest in housing to match that of education and health.

Labour London Assemby member Valerie Shawcross was the last speaker. In the Q&A some Housing Associations got a bit of a pasting from the politicians over their variable management standards, being so fragmented, inefficient, arrogant and unaccountable.  

I'll post my submission later.

Why we all hate George Galloway (unless you do community politics)


It just goes to show that you just can't keep a bad man down! Poor old Bradford West. They will soon learn - as did the people of Tower Hamlets. First posted here November 2007. Hat-tip Col Roi.

Friday, March 30, 2012

A ramble about books

Normally my bookish blog postings occur on my book blog. There’s an element of logic in that. But occasionally I feel like confusing everyone so today here’s a ramble about books.

Have you ever read a book that scared you? I’ve read two, both when I was about fourteen. One was a school text – William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. An ‘adventure tale’ about a group of British schoolboys marooned on a tropical island. It is horrible. It repugnantly exposes the duality of human nature itself - the dark, eternal divide between order and chaos, intellect and instinct, structure and savagery. The unkindness of man (or boy) to man is shown in all its abomination. I didn’t only dislike the book but it scared me because I realised children could act like that.

The other one was The Island of Doctor Moreau by H G Wells. Written in 1896, it was an instant sensation. It was meant as a commentary on Darwin's theory of evolution, which H. G. Wells stoutly believed. The story centres on the depraved Dr. Moreau, who conducts unspeakable animal experiments on a remote tropical island, with hideous, humanlike results. Edward Prendick, an Englishman whose misfortunes bring him to the island, is witness to the Beast Folk's strange civilization and their eventual terrifying regression. While gene-splicing and bio-engineering are common practices today you have to remember Wells's haunting vision and the ethical questions he raised were over a hundred years ago. Because I was inspired by the idea of Well’s being so ahead of his time (as was Jules Verne) I started the book again when I was in my thirties or forties and this time I didn’t even finish it – it was so revolting.



The film of the book - 1932's Island of Lost Souls, starred Charles Laughton and Bela Lugosi. Originally rejected and unclassified by the British Board of Film Censors in 1933 - and again in 1957 - the film was eventually classified with an X certificate with cuts in 1958. In 1996 these cuts were restored and the film gained a 12 certificate. In 2011, it was resubmitted for a new DVD/Blu-ray release and was passed as a PG - making it viewable by children, though it carries the warning: "Contains mild violence and scary scenes". "When we had to classify it again last year, we went for PG on the basis of the comparison with the Doctor Whos and the Harry Potters," explained BBFC director David Cooke. Obviously folk are not scared as easily nowadays as in my youth!

Changing the specific topic but keeping with books - Booking Through Thursday is a weekly meme and a different question is posted every week.

This week there were two questions - Are there any fictional characters whom you have emulated (or tried to)? Who and why? And, secondly, what literary character do you feel is most like you personality-wise (explain)?

As a youngster I always tried to emulate the latest hero I was reading about and it didn't matter if they were elf, dragon rider or human. Nowadays I am satisfied being me but once I'm back in a book there's usually someone I'm identifying with.

I can't say I've ever felt there was someone I was really like. Pity - there are plenty I wish I was like! Perhaps the nearest is Professor John Keating in "Dead Poet's Society" by Nancy Kleinbaum (1989) - as played by Robin Williams in the film. I was unconventional; I tried very hard to inspire those I worked with; sometimes succeeded and equally frequently fell foul of bureaucracy.  But none of my staff ever shot themselves!.

I don’t read many book review blogs on a regular basis but I sometimes wander around a number of them and take a quick peek. This week I came across Edwards Granddaughter who reviewed Absolutely Organize Your Family by Debbie Lillard. It sounds interesting and I liked this summary of Lillard’s philosophy –
“In all areas we should:
           Only keep what you use
           Subtract before you add
           Finish one project before you start another one
           Daily routines are a must

Oh how I need to remember those four rules! It would make me so much more organised.  I console myself by thinking it may make me rather boring….  That's my excuse.

And now I’m off back to my book – I’m currently reading ‘The Somnambulist’ by Essie Fox published last year. When seventeen-year old Phoebe Turner visits Wilton's Music Hall to watch her Aunt Cissy performing on stage, she risks the wrath of her mother Maud who marches with the Hallelujah Army, campaigning for theatres to close. While there, Phoebe is drawn to a stranger, the enigmatic Nathaniel Samuels who heralds dramatic changes in the lives of all three women. But some secrets are better left buried….  It's a rattling good yarn, as they say.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...